Cosmetic breast augmentation in Australia: a cost of complication study

Main Article Content

George S Miller
Suzanne Robinson
Christopher M Reid
Professor https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5660-0572

Keywords

costs and cost analysis, mammaplasty, breast, economic models, health policy

Abstract

Background: Treatment of complications from cosmetic breast augmentation is subsidised by government funding in Australia.


Aim: We aimed to estimate the total cost to the Australian public health system of the treatment of complications following cosmetic breast augmentation.


Method: Using the PRISMA 2009 statement, a systematic review was conducted to find articles reporting on complications following cosmetic breast augmentation. A quantitative analysis was performed to calculate overall complication rates.


An economic cost analysis was performed on data from procedures performed in Australia between 2000-01 and 2014-15. We modelled costs to the public health system for this period and projected costs to the year 2030.


Results: Thirty-nine articles were identified for inclusion in the quantitative analysis of complication rates following cosmetic breast augmentation. Economic modelling showed an estimated cost of over A$10 million just for surgeons’ and surgical assistants’ fees to treat complications between 2000 and 2015. We forecast over A$50 million for this cost over the subsequent fifteen years. Total health spending on complications is estimated to have been almost A$200 million between 2000 and 2015.


Conclusion: This study illustrates the significant economic cost to the Australian health system created by complications following cosmetic breast augmentation. We believe this study reinforces the importance of the Australian breast device registry (ABDR) to further guide regulation, economic policy and health policy.


 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Abstract 534 | PDF Downloads 151 HTML Downloads 166

References

1. Bhatia RS, Levinson W, Shortt S, Pendrith C, Fric-Shamji E, Kallewaard M, Peul W, Veillard J, Elshaug A, Forde I, Kerr EA. Measuring the effect of choosing wisely: an integrated framework to assess campaign impact on low-value care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015; 24(8): 523–31. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004070 PMid:26092165
2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Procedures and healthcare interventions (ACHI 2nd-8th editions), Australia, 2000-01 to 2014-15 [web report]. Canberra: Australian Government [Updated 5 July 2018
3. Hvilsom GB, Holmich LR, Henriksen TF, Lipworth L, McLaughlin JK, Friis S. Local complications after cosmetic breast augmentation: results from the Danish registry for plastic surgery of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(3):919–25. PMid:19730312
4. Kjoller K, Holmich LR, Jacobsen PH, Friis S, Fryzek J, McLaughlin JK, Lipworth L, Henrikson TF, Jorgensen S, Bittmann S, Olsen JH. Epidemiological investigation of local complications after cosmetic breast implant surgery in Denmark. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;48(3):229–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-200203000-00001 PMid:11862025
5. Namnoum JD, Largent J, Kaplan HM, Oefelein MG, Brown MH. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type. J Plast Reconstr Aes. 2013;66(9):1165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2013.04.046 PMid:23664574
6. Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Bengtson BP, Murphy DK. Ten-year results from the Natrelle 410 anatomical form-stable silicone breast implant core study. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2015;35(2):145–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sju084 PMid:25717116 PMCid:PMC4399443
7. Spear SL, Murphy DK. Natrelle round silicone breast implants: core study results at 10 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(6):1354–361. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000021 PMid:24867717 PMCid:PMC4819531
8. Lista F, Tutino R, Khan A, Ahmad J. Subglandular breast augmentation with textured, anatomic, cohesive silicone implants: a review of 440 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(2):295–303. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182958a6d PMid:23584627
9. Caplin DA. Indications for the use of MemoryShape breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: long-term clinical outcomes of shaped versus round silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134 Suppl 3:27s–37s. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000609 PMid:25158767
10. Henriksen TF, Holmich LR, Fryzek JP, Friis S, McLaughlin JK, Høyer AP, Kjøller K, Olsen JH. Incidence and severity of short-term complications after breast augmentation: results from a nationwide breast implant registry. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;51(6):531–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000096446.44082.60 PMid:14646643
11. Stevens WG, Calobrace MB, Harrington J, Alizadeh K, Zeidler KR, d’Incelli RC. Nine-year core study data for sientra’s FDA-approved round and shaped implants with high-strength cohesive silicone gel. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2016;36(4):404–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw015 PMid:26961987
12. Benito-Ruiz J, Manzano ML, Salvador-Miranda L. Five-year outcomes of breast augmentation with form-stable implants: periareolar vs transaxillary. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2017;37(1):46–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw154 PMid:27694448
13. Nava MB, Rancati A, Angrigiani C, Catanuto G, Rocco N. How to prevent complications in breast augmentation. Gland Surg. 2017;6(2):210–17. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2017.04.02 PMid:28497025 PMCid:PMC5409896
14. Hanefeld J, Horsfall D, Lunt N, Smith R. Medical tourism: a cost or benefit to the NHS? PLOS One. 2013;8(10):e70406. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070406 PMid:24204556 PMCid:PMC3812100
15. Fagrell D, Berggren A, Tarpila E. Capsular contracture around saline-filled fine textured and smooth mammary implants: a prospective 7.5-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(7):2108–112. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200112000-00047 PMid:11743411
16. Blount AL, Martin MD, Lineberry KD, Kettaneh N, Alfonso DR. Capsular contracture rate in a low-risk population after primary augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2013;33(4):516–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X13484465 PMid:23636624
17. Walker PS, Walls B, Murphy DK. Natrelle saline-filled breast implants: a prospective 10-year study. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2009;29(1):19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2008.10.001 PMid:19233001
18. Swanson E. Prospective comparative clinical evaluation of 784 consecutive cases of breast augmentation and vertical mammaplasty, performed individually and in combination. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(1):30e–45e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182910b2e PMid:23806952
19. Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F, Delogu D, Cervelli V, Walgenbach K. A retrospective analysis of 3,000 primary aesthetic breast augmentations: postoperative complications and associated factors. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2007;31(5):532–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-0162-8 PMid:17659411
20. Levi B, Rademaker AW, Fine NA, Mustoe TA. Comparison of breast implant deflation for mentor anterior and posterior valve designs in aesthetic and reconstructive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(3):685–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318182378e PMid:18766029
21. Stevens WG, Stoker DA, Fellows DR, Hirsch EM. Acceleration of textured saline breast implant deflation rate: results and analysis of 645 implants. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2005;25(1):37–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2004.11.005 PMid:19338785
22. Somogyi RB, Brown MH. Outcomes in primary breast augmentation: a single surgeon’s review of 1539 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(1):87–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000773 PMid:25539298
23. Basile AR, Basile F, Basile AV. Late infection following breast augmentation with textured silicone gel-filled implants. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2005;25(3):249–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2005.02.006 PMid:19338816
24. Brown MH, Shenker R, Silver SA. Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(3):768–79. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000176259.66948.e7 PMid:16141814
25. Collis N, Coleman D, Foo IT, Sharpe DT. Ten-year review of a prospective randomized controlled trial of textured versus smooth subglandular silicone gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(4):786–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200009020-00005 PMid:11007389
26. Dancey A, Nassimizadeh A, Levick P. Capsular contracture—what are the risk factors? A 14-year series of 1400 consecutive augmentations. J Plast Reconstr Aes. 2012;65(2):213–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2011.09.011 PMid:21930448
27. Giordano S, Peltoniemi H, Lilius P, Salmi A. Povidone-iodine combined with antibiotic topical irrigation to reduce capsular contracture in cosmetic breast augmentation: a comparative study. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2013;33(5):675–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X13491490 PMid:23757043
28. Haws MJ, Schwartz MR, Berger LH, Daulton KL. Sientra portfolio of Silimed brand shaped implants with high-strength silicone gel: a 5-year primary augmentation clinical study experience and a postapproval experience-results from a single-surgeon 108-patient series. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134 Suppl 1:38s–46s. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000346 PMid:25057747
29. Holmich LR, Breiting VB, Fryzek JP, Brandt B, Wolthers MS, Kjøller K, McLaughlin JK, Friis S. Long-term cosmetic outcome after breast implantation. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59(6):597–604. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31803c7c78 PMid:18046137
30. Niechajev I, Jurell G, Lohjelm L. Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2007;31(6):697–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0057-0 PMid:17653683
31. Pfeiffer P, Jorgensen S, Kristiansen TB, Jorgensen A, Holmich LR. Protective effect of topical antibiotics in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):629–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181addc68 PMid:19644284
32. Sevin A, Sevin K, Senen D, Deren O, Adanali G, Erdogan B. Augmentation mammaplasty: retrospective analysis of 210 cases. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2006;30(6):651–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0076-x PMid:17093874
33. Stevens WG, Hirsch EM, Tenenbaum MJ, Acevedo M. A prospective study of 708 form-stable silicone gel breast implants. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2010;30(5):693–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X10381880 PMid:20884898
34. Doren EL, Pierpont YN, Shivers SC, Berger LH. Comparison of Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra contoured cohesive gel breast implants: a single surgeon’s 10-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(5):957–66. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001675 PMid:26505700
35. Doshier LJ, Eagan SL, Shock LA, Henry SL, Colbert SH, Puckett CL. The subtleties of success in simultaneous augmentation-mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(3):585–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002517 PMid:27556602
36. Drinane JJ, Kortes MJ, Bergman RS, Folkers BL. Evaluation of antibiotic irrigation versus saline irrigation in reducing the long-term incidence and severity of capsular contraction after primary augmentation mammoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77(1):32–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000302 PMid:25144414
37. Flugstad NA, Pozner JN, Baxter RA, Creasman C, Egrari S, Martin S, Messa CA, Oliva A, Schlesinger SL, Kortesis WG. Does implant insertion with a funnel decrease capsular contracture? A preliminary report. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2016;36(5):550–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv237 PMid:26672104
38. Keramidas E, Lymperopoulos NS, Rodopoulou S. Is antibiotic prophylaxis in breast augmentation necessary? A prospective study. Plastic surgery (Oakv). 2016;24(3):195–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/229255031602400310
39. Kerfant N, Henry AS, Hu W, Marchac A, Auclair E. Subfascial primary breast augmentation with fat grafting: a review of 156 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(5):1080e-085e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003299 PMid:28445355
40. McGuire P, Reisman NR, Murphy DK. Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture, malposition, and late seroma in subjects receiving natrelle 410 form-stable silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002837 PMid:27627058 PMCid:PMC5201411
41. Castello MF, Lazzeri D, Silvestri A, Agostini T, Pascone C, Marcelli C, Gigliotti D, D’Aniello C, Gasparotti M. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2011;35(5):828–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9704-1 PMid:21455821
42. Forster NA, Kunzi W, Giovanoli P. The reoperation cascade after breast augmentation with implants: what the patient needs to know. J Plast Reconstr Aes. 2013;66(3):313–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2012.09.033 PMid:23102610
43. Grewal NS, Fisher J. Why do patients seek revisionary breast surgery? Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33(2):237–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X12472693 PMid:23388645
44. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian Demographic Statistics, June 2014. Canberra: Australian Government [Released 18 December 2014
45. Gurgacz S, Lambert R, Vogan A, Cooter R, Mutimer K, Maddern G. Rapid review: breast prosthesis implantation for reconstructive and cosmetic surgery: Australian safety and efficacy register of new interventional procedures-surgical. ASERNIP-S report no. 82. Royal Australian College of Surgeons. Adelaide, South Australia, December 2013. [Updated December 2013
46. Schaub TA, Ahmad J, Rohrich RJ. Capsular contracture with breast implants in the cosmetic patient: saline versus silicone—a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(6):2140–149. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f2b5a2 PMid:20661169
47. Wong CH, Samuel M, Tan BK, Song C. Capsular contracture in subglandular breast augmentation with textured versus smooth breast implants: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(5):1224–236. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000237013.50283.d2 PMid:17016195
48. Liu X, Zhou L, Pan F, Gao Y, Yuan X, Fan D. Comparison of the postoperative incidence rate of capsular contracture among different breast implants: a cumulative meta-analysis. PLOS One.2015;10(2):e0116071. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116071 PMid:25680100 PMCid:PMC4332657
49. Horsnell JD, Searle AE, Harris PA. Intra-operative techniques to reduce the risk of capsular contracture in patients undergoing aesthetic breast augmentation—a review. Surgeon 2017;15(5):282–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2017.03.001 PMid:28476310
50. Gampper TJ, Khoury H, Gottlieb W, Morgan RF. Silicone gel implants in breast augmentation and reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59(5):581–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000258970.31562.5d PMid:17992156
51. Huang N, Liu M, Yu P, Wu J. Antibiotic prophylaxis in prosthesis-based mammoplasty: a systematic review. Int J Surg. 2015;15:31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.020 PMid:25638736
52. Egeberg A, Sorensen JA. The impact of breast implant location on the risk of capsular contraction. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77(2):255–59. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000227 PMid:25003431
53. Yalanis GC, Liu EW, Cheng HT. Efficacy and safety of povidone-iodine irrigation in reducing the risk of capsular contracture in aesthetic breast augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(4):687–98. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001576 PMid:26397246
54. Alderman A, Pusic A, Murphy DK. Prospective analysis of primary breast augmentation on body image using the BREAST-Q: results from a nationwide study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(6):954e-60e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002183 PMid:27219264 PMCid:PMC4879787
55. Murphy DK, Beckstrand M, Sarwer DB. A prospective, multi-center study of psychosocial outcomes after augmentation with natrelle silicone-filled breast implants. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62(2):118–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31817f01f8 PMid:19158517
56. McCarthy CM, Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott A, Van Laeken N, Lennox PA, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL. The magnitude of effect of cosmetic breast augmentation on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(1):218–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318254b3bc PMid:22743886
57. Livingston R, Berlund P, Eccles-Smith J, Sawhney R. The real cost of ‘cosmetic tourism’ cost analysis study of ‘cosmetic tourism’ complications presenting to a public hospital. E-Plast. 2015;15:e34.
58. Miyagi K, Auberson D, Patel AJ, Malata CM. The unwritten price of cosmetic tourism: an observational study and cost analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aes. 2012;65(1):22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2011.07.027 PMid:21865103
59. Adabi K, Stern CS, Weichman KE, Garfein ES, Pothula A, Draper L, Tepper OM. Population health implications of medical tourism. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(1):66–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003459 PMid:28654593
60. Boulton TN, Malacrida C. Women and cosmetic breast surgery: weighing the medical, social, and lifestyle risks. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(4):511–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311421774 PMid:21908704
61. Brunton G, Paraskeva N, Caird J, Bird KS, Kavanagh J, Kwan I, Stansfield C, Rumsey N, Thomas J. Psychosocial predictors, assessment, and outcomes of cosmetic procedures: a systematic rapid evidence assessment. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2014;38(5):1030-040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0369-4 PMid:24962402
62. Alderman AK, Bauer J, Fardo D, Abrahamse P, Pusic A. Understanding the effect of breast augmentation on quality of life: prospective analysis using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(4):787–95. PMid:24675184
63. Lipworth L, Nyren O, Ye W, Fryzek JP, Tarone RE, McLaughlin JK. Excess mortality from suicide and other external causes of death among women with cosmetic breast implants. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59(2):119–123; discussion 124–15.
64. Figueroa-Haas CL. Effect of breast augmentation mammoplasty on self-esteem and sexuality: a quantitative analysis. Plast Surg Nurs. 2007;27(1):16–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PSN.0000264159.30505.c9 PMid:17356451
65. Li S, Chen L, Liu W, Mu D, Luan J. Capsular contracture rate after breast augmentation with periareolar versus other two (inframammary and transaxillary) incisions: a meta-analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2018;42(1):32–37 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0965-1 PMid:28916908
66. Zelken J, Cheng MH. Asian breast augmentation: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Global Open. 2015;3(11):e555. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000528 PMid:26893980 PMCid:PMC4727707
67. Berry MG, Stanek JJ. Brachial plexus impingement: an unusual complication of bilateral breast augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2008;32(2):381–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9055-0 PMid:18043961
68. Dragoumis DM, Assimaki AS, Vrizas TI, Tsiftsoglou AP. Axillary silicone lymphadenopathy secondary to augmentation mammaplasty. Indian J Plast Surg. 2010;43(2):206–09.< https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.73453 PMid:21217983 PMCid:PMC3010785
69. Iorwerth A, Cochrane R, Webster DJ. Chronic haematoma as a late complication of cosmetic breast augmentation. Breast. 2000;9(3):158–60. https://doi.org/10.1054/brst.1999.0117 PMid:14731841
70. Nagrani T, Neuman T, Baldari D, Zaher M, Lafferty J, Baglini R, Kasabian A. Tamponade following breast augmentation. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64(2):141–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181b0bb1f PMid:20098095
71. Johnson L, O’Donoghue JM, McLean N, Turton P, Khan AA, Turner SD, Lennard A, Collis N, Butterworth M, Gui G, Bristol J, Hurren J, Smith S, Grover K,
72. Spyrou G, Krupa K, Azmy IA, Young IE, Staiano JJ, Khalil H, MacNeill FA. Breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: the UK experience. Recommendations on its management and implications for informed consent. Eur J Plast Surg. 2017;43(8):1393–401.
73. Srinivasa DR, Miranda RN, Kaura A, Francis AM, Campanale A, Boldrini R, Alexander J, Deva AK, Gravina PR, Medeiros LJ, Nast K, Butler CE, Clemens MW. Global adverse event reports of breast implant-associated ALCL: an international review of 40 government authority databases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(5):1029–039. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003233 PMid:28157770
74. Australian Breast Device Registry [website]. Canberra: Australian Government, 2017 [Cited 1 January 2018]. Available from: http://www.abdr.org.au.