About the Journal
Focus and scope
The Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery is a peer-reviewed, online-only, journal covering all aspects of plastic and reconstructive surgery research and review including aesthetic, breast, burns, cleft lip and palate, craniomaxillofacial, experimental research, general reconstruction, hand, head and neck, history of plastic and military surgery, international collaboration, melanoma and skin cancer, paediatric, PRS Board of Training and technical and preoperative investigations/imaging.
Established by the Australian Society of Plastic Surgeons the Australasian Foundation for Plastic Surgery and the New Zealand Association of Plastic Surgeons, the journal is published twice a year, in March and September.
The editorial team of the Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery invites authors from any country to submit articles for publication on any aspect of plastic surgery. All manuscripts submitted to the journal are screened by the editors-in-chief. Manuscripts are immediately rejected if they do not follow the AJOPS author guidelines, are not in line with the aims of the journal, or are well short of the standard required for publication. For more information on how to submit to the journal, our guidelines, copyright notice and privacy statement, click here.
Please note, a publication fee applies to accepted submissions where none of the authors are members of ASPS or NZAPS. The fee of AU$500 is charged after the peer review process is complete and prior to publication. If at least one of the authors is an ASPS or NZAPS member, there is no fee. Likewise, there is no fee for international authors of papers invited by the editors-in-chief.
Peer review process
The Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery reviews all material submitted. For original articles, review articles and case reports, the journal accepts open submissions and has adopted a double-blind peer review process. In this type of peer review, all identifying information is removed from the submission so that authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.
Editorials, letters to the editor, media reviews, perspectives, how to guides, practical non-clinical skills for surgeons, video content and features written by the journal’s own editorial staff do not undergo external peer review. Articles reporting original research conducted by AJOPS editors are independently peer reviewed. If you experience any adverse event arising from double-blind peer review process, or would like to tell us your views, please email email@example.com.
Information for reviewers can be found here.
Open Access Policy
The Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery provides open access to peer reviewed research as part of its commitment to readers and authors. We make all our research articles freely available online as PDF and HTML and publish linked DOIs for all journal content. Authors are encouraged to provide their ORC-ID and we hope to have direct exports of data to indexing services in place soon. Please note, as at June 2019, we have applications pending to a number of services including the Directory of Open Access Journals.
Authors retain copyright of their article and have a choice of publishing under the following Creative Commons Licence terms:
- Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) (recommended)
Lets others distribute and copy the article, create extracts, abstracts, and other revised versions, adaptations or derivative works of or from an article (such as a translation), include in a collective work (such as an anthology), text or data mine the article, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit the author(s), do not represent the author as endorsing their adaptation of the article, and do not modify the article in such a way as to damage the author's honour or reputation.
- Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence (CC BY-NC)
Lets others distribute, remix and build upon the work, but only if it is for non-commercial purposes and they credit the original creator/s (and any other nominated parties).
- Creative Commons Attribution-Non-commercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND)
For non-commercial purposes, lets others distribute and copy the article, and to include in a collective work (such as an anthology), as long as they credit the author(s) and provided they do not alter or modify the article.
As part of our committment to developing and implementing best practice policies and procedures for publications ethics, AJOPS editors and reviewers undertake to treat all manuscripts fairly and in confidence and to declare any competing interests in line with the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' (ICMJE) Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines.
We ask all authors to be aware of, and comply with, ICMJE requirements and COPE guidelines, particularly in relation to authorship (including avoiding 'ghost' or 'guest' authorship), plagiarism, simultaneous submission, redundant or duplicate publication, manipulation of statistics, competing or conflicting interests and compliance with policies on research ethics (Declaration of Helsinki, the use of animals in research, randomised controlled trials and clinical trials including registration and systematic reviews and meta-analyses).
As per COPE guidelines, we will investigate all allegations of research or publication misconduct and take steps to correct these. If you have any concerns about possible misconduct please contact the journal directly via our email address, firstname.lastname@example.org. All correspondence should be addressed to the Editors-in-Chief and will be treated confidentially.
Authorship and acknowledgements
The journal adheres to the definition of authorship by the ICMJE. The ICMJE recommends that authorship be based on the following four criteria:
- Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work;
- Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content;
- Final approval of the version to be published; and
- Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Contributors who do not qualify as authors should be mentioned under ‘Acknowledgements’. If a submission has more than five authors, the inclusion of each name must be justified in the covering letter. Results of multicentre studies may be reported under the name of the organising group. For more information on contributor roles, please refer to the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) website.
Corresponding authors are responsible for the submission meeting all AJOPS publishing requirements outlined here and in our Author guidelines. They must ensure that all co-authors are appropriately cited or acknowledged and have seen, and approved, the final version submitted to the journal. If accepted, corresponding authors must acknowledge, in writing, that all authors consent to any changes to authorship or text prior to publication. Following publication, corresponding authors are the point of contact for any queries about the published paper and must resolve any questions or issues that arise promptly, informing all co-authors.
AJOPS endorses ORCiD and asks all authors to provide their own, and their co-authors', ORCiD upon submission of a manuscript (For existing authors, this information can be added to a user's profile by opening the 'More user information' box indicated by a '+'. If you experience any problems trying to update your ORCiD, please email email@example.com.)
On publication, all authors' who have added their ORCiD will have it displayed as a hyperlink on the view article page next to their name. In future, once the journal is indexed (pending, as at June 2019), we propose to implement the auto-update feature offered by Crossref that deposits authors' ORCiDs and simultaneously updates their ORCID record at the time of publication. We encourage authors to read more about ORCID.
Manuscripts with plagiarised content will not be considered by the journal. If plagiarism is identified, we will follow COPE guidelines. Authors whose work has been flagged as containing possible plagiarised content by AJOPS editors or reviewers will have an opportunity to respond to the journal's concerns. If no response is recieved the journal reserves the right to reject the submission, issue a correction or retraction (if the manuscript has already been published) and contact authors' institutions, funders or regulatory bodies as necessary.
Plagiarism includes, but is not limited to:
- copying, either verbatum or close, text from other sources without attribution/citation
- using illustrations (includes images, graphs or diagrams) from other sources without attribution
- significantly reusing your own text from previous publications without attribution or the agreement of the editor (read the COPE guidelines on text recycling)(note, there are exceptions relating to methods)
- using the original structure, argument or idea from another source as a major part of a new publication without attribution (where it is clear this has not been developed by the authors).
At present the Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery uses Grammarly to check content flagged by editors or reviewers. Once we have our metadata deposits to Crossref fully in place, we will use Similarity Check (pending, as of June 2019).
Reproduction of copyright material
If excerpts from copyrighted works owned by third parties are included, credit must be shown in the manuscript. It is the author’s responsibility to also obtain written permission for reproduction from the copyright owners.
The journal does not consider manuscripts that are simultaneously being considered by other journals. Occasionally, editors of different journals may knowingly agree to jointly publish selected articles because of the need for wide coverage. Examples include publication guidelines and important recommendations on public health. It is the responsibility of authors to ensure that two or more journals do not unknowingly publish the same article.
Redundant or duplicate publication
Redundant or duplicate publication occurs when a submission is published that overlaps substantially with one that has already been published in either print or electronic media. An article is reviewed for publication on the assumption that its contents have not been submitted simultaneously to another journal, have not been accepted for publication elsewhere and have not already been published.
The journal will consider manuscripts that have been rejected by another journal, that follow the publication of preliminary findings in the form of an abstract, or that provide supplementary information about a large complex study.
References must be provided for all publications that relate to the manuscript under consideration. In addition, copies of any possible duplicate published material should be submitted with a statement in the covering letter explaining why the manuscript under consideration is not a duplicate publication. This includes articles in press or under consideration by another journal. Any attempt at dual publication will lead to automatic rejection, may prejudice acceptance of future submissions, and may be highlighted in the journal.
Authors must declare any financial support or relationships that may pose conflict of interest by disclosing at the time of submission any financial arrangements they have with a company whose product figures prominently in the submitted manuscript or with a company making a competing product. Such information will be held in confidence while the article is under review and will not influence the editorial decision. If the article is accepted for publication, the editor will usually discuss with the authors the manner in which such information is to be communicated to the reader. The conflict of interest form can be found here.
Declaration of Helsinki
Manuscripts must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in Brazil in October 2013). This approval must be declared in the Methods section of the article with inclusion of the name of the committee. In addition, patient anonymity must be preserved at all times. The journal will not publish pictures that identify patients unless the authors submit evidence of written consent from the patient or a legal guardian. The AJOPS Patient Consent form can be found here.
Use of animals in research
Reports of animal experiments must state that the principles of the care and use of animals for scientific purposes were followed, as well as any specific national laws where applicable.
Randomised controlled trials
Reporting of randomised controlled trials should follow the guidelines of The CONSORT Statement (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials).
Clinical trials should be clearly identified as such in the title and abstract. A clinical trial is any study that prospectively assigns humans into groups to study the relationship between an intervention and a clinical outcome. Clinical trials should adhere to the guidelines outlined in the CONSORT Statement and all manuscripts must include a flow chart showing the progress of patients through the trial.
Clinical trial registration
The journal requires that the clinical trials submitted for its consideration are registered in a publicly accessible database. Authors should include the name of the trial register and their clinical trial registration number in the acknowledgements section of their manuscript. If you wish the editor/s to consider an unregistered trial, please explain briefly why the trial has not been registered.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
All systematic reviews of clinical trials must adhere to the guidelines outlined in the MOOSE report by the CONSORT Group. Authors should include a section describing the methods used for locating, selecting, extracting, and synthesising data. Authors are encouraged to use subheadings in the main text of the manuscript. The structured abstract should have the following sections: Background, Objectives, Data sources, Review methods, Results, and Conclusions.
All meta-analyses of randomised trials must adhere to the guidelines outlined in the PRISMA Statement1 which is designed to improve manuscript quality. Meta-analyses authors should review their papers against these guidelines before submission and can find the recommended PRISMA flow chart here and a sample check list here.
1 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 6(7): e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
The journal utilises the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration.
Statements and opinions expressed in the articles and communications herein, including comments made by readers, are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the editors, the Australian Society of Plastic Surgeons, Australasian Foundation for Plastic Surgery or the New Zealand Association of Plastic Surgeons.
The editorial team of the Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery invites authors from any country to submit articles for publication on any aspect of plastic surgery. All manuscripts submitted to the journal are screened by the editors-in-chief. Manuscripts are immediately rejected if they are not in line with the aims of the journal, do not follow the Author Guidelines, or are well short of the standard required for publication.