Type: Case report
Published: 15-03-2019


Thoracic osteomyelitis secondary to a complicated digital mucous cyst infection: a case report

Jake L Nowicki MD BSc,1 Andrew Raymond MBBS,1 Phillip A Griffin MBBS FRACS (Plast)1


Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Flinders Medical Centre
Bedford Park, South Australia


Name: Jake L Nowicki
Address: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Flinders Medical Centre
Flinders Drive
Bedford Park, South Australia, 5041
Email: [email protected]
Phone: +61 425 706 925
Citation: Nowicki J, Raymond A, Griffin PA. Thoracic osteomyelitis secondary to a complicated digital mucous cyst infection. Aust J Plast Surg. 2019;2(1):103–105. https://doi.org/10.34239/ajops.v2i1.97
Accepted for publication: 7 August 2018
Copyright © 2019. Authors retain their copyright in the article. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Section: Hand


Since the first description by Hyde in 1883,1 the pathogenesis and clinical features of digital mucous (DM) cysts, as well as treatment options, have been well described in the literature.2 Complications associated with surgical treatment include cyst recurrence, loss of range of motion of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint, joint stiffness, post-surgical infection and nail dystrophies.3 Digital mucous cyst infection prior to treatment is not well documented. This report describes a complicated case of a DM cyst infection upon presentation with subsequent development of DIP joint septic arthritis, bacteremia and thoracic spinal osteomyelitis.

Keywords: osteomyelitis, cysts, bacteremia


A 68-year-old female with a history of rheumatoid arthritis (not on immunosuppression) presented to hospital with a two-day history of a worsening, right little finger mucous cyst infection. She had attempted to decompress it with a needle four days earlier. Examination revealed pus from the mucous cyst with surrounding epidermolysis and evidence of proximally spreading cellulitis. She had pain on DIP joint axial loading and passive movement. A plain radiograph of her hand demonstrated swelling at the right little finger DIP joint (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Radiograph of the patient’s right index finger at presentation demonstrating soft tissue swelling over the right little finger distal and proximal interphalangeal joints.

The patient was given 1.5g of intravenous vancomycin and urgently taken to theatre. Specialist plastic surgeons evacuated pus from the mucous cyst and the DIP joint, noting the terminal extensor tendon as ruptured but the central slip intact. Intraoperative swabs were taken and cultured, showing methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Blood cultures were also positive, for which infectious disease specialists suggested 1g intravenous vancomycin twice daily. Transthoracic or transoesophageal echocardiograms found no evidence of infective endocarditis.

Daily blood cultures tested positive for eight days after admission. The patient was returned to theatre after four days as she had persistent fevers and raised inflammatory markers. Further pus was evacuated from the DIP joint, the nail removed and the nail bed and distal phalanx debrided.

Four days later, the patient was again returned to theatre where extensive epidermolysis of the little finger was debrided. The exposed extensor digitorum tendon was partly debrided and the central slip was detached and non-viable. A split thickness skin graft was harvested for wound closure and a longitudinal 0.9mm Kirschner wire arthrodesis placed through both interphalangeal joints. Intravenous vancomycin was changed to intravenous cephazolin at 2g three times daily, after which the patient showed no further positive blood cultures. The patien’ts graft was reviewed after a further four days and considered satisfactory and she was discharged with a plan to complete another four weeks of intravenous cephazolin.

The patient presented to hospital again five weeks after discharge with severe back pain and lethargy. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed T1/T2 transverse myelitis/discitis with vertebral endplate destruction and a loculated paravertebral fluid collection anteriorly (Figure 2). There was mild cord compression on imaging but no symptoms or clinical signs of compression. She recommenced intravenous cephazolin at 2g three times daily. Her pain and inflammatory markers subsequently improved and her neurological observations were normal. She was discharged after a week in hospital with a plan for six weeks of intravenous cephazolin antibiotics. Regular outpatient reviews were conducted, including hand therapy for movement of stiff interphalangeal joints in her little finger.

Figure 2. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrating T1/T2 discitis/vertebral osteomyelitis with an anterior paravertebral collection and mild cord compression


Infection is a well-documented complication following the excision of DM cysts4 but there are few reports of mucous cyst infection occurring prior to treatment. In 1984, Rangarathnam and Linscheid5 documented a series of four patients who developed infected DM cysts prior to treatment. Two of these patients described a history of trauma to the cyst, including one with an attempted needle decompression similar to the patient in this study. Bourns and Sanerkin studied a series of 20 patients with DM cysts,6 only one of which was noted to have presented with an infection after the DM cyst had spontaneously ruptured.

However, most hand surgeons would agree that infected DM cysts prior to treatment are not uncommon. When they do occur, associated DIP joint pyathrosis and osteomyelitis often lead to poorer outcomes for patients, particularly in the form of joint stiffness and pain.7


This report, linking a mucous cyst infection with a systemic sepsis and vertebral osteomyelitis, appears to be unique. It highlights the need for aggressive management in such cases. Further study of outcome differences in DM cysts that are managed with, and without, infection would be beneficial.


The authors have no financial or commercial conflicts of interest to disclose.


  1. Hyde JN. A practical treatise on diseases of the skin, for the use of students and practitioners. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1883. p 423.
  2. Jabbour S, Kechichian E, Haber R, Tomb R, Nasr M. Management of digital mucous cysts: a systematic review and treatment algorithm. Int J Dermatol. 2017;56(7):701–08. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.13583 PMid:28239853
  3. Li K and Barankin B. Digital mucous cysts. J Cutan Med Surg. 2010;14(5):199–206. https://doi.org/10.2310/7750.2010.09058 PMid:20868616
  4. Fritz GR, Stern PJ, Dickey, M. Complications following mucous cyst excision. J Hand Surg Br. 1997;22(2):222–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-7681(97)80067-8
  5. Rangarathnam CS and Linscheid RL. Infected mucous cyst of the finger. J Hand Surg Am. 1984;9(2):245–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(84)80152-5
  6. Bourns HK,Sanerkin, NG. Mucoid lesions (‘mucoid cysts’) of the fingers and toes: clinical features and pathogenesis. Br J Surg. 1963;50:860–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.18005022625 PMid:14072627
  7. Rizzo M, Beckenbaugh RD. Treatment of mucous cysts of the fingers: review of 134 cases with minimum 2-year follow-up evaluation. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28(3):519–24. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2003.50088 PMid:12772114