Main Article Content
Aesthetic surgery, Cosmetic Surgery, Reconstructive surgery, Plastic surgery
2. Tagliacozzi G. De Curtorum Chirurgia Per Insitionem (“On the Surgery of Mutilation by Grafting”). Venice: Gaspare Bindoni, 1597, a technico-procedural manual for the surgical repair and reconstruction of facial wounds in soldiers.
3. Mendelson B. In Your Face: The Hidden History of Plastic Surgery and Why Looks Matter. Richmond: Hardie Grant Books, 2013: 81.
4. Gillies H, Millard DR Jr. The Principles and Art of Plastic Surgery: Vol 1-2. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1957: 690 with 2,472 illustrations, 122 in color.
5. Barton FE Jr. Facial Rejuvenation. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, 2008: 358.
6. Barton FE Jr. Rhytidectomy and the nasolabial fold. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992; 90(4): 601-607.
7. Barton FE Jr. The SMAS and the nasolabial fold. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992; 89(6): 1054-1057; discussion 1058-1059 (histological study of the NLF).
8. Taylor GI, Palmer JH. The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg. 1987; 40(2): 113-141.
9. Taylor GI, Corlett RJ, Dhar SC, Ashton MW. The anatomical (angiosome) and clinical territories of cutaneous perforating arteries: development of the concept and designing safe flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127(4): 1447-1459.
10. Dhar SC, Taylor GI (1999). The delay phenomenon: the story unfolds. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104(7): 2079-2091.
11. Callegari PR, Taylor GI, Caddy CM, Minabe T. An anatomic review of the delay phenomenon. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992; 89(3): 397-407; discussion 417-418.
12. Taylor GI, Chubb DP, Ashton MW. True and ‘choke’ anastomoses between perforator angiosomes. Part I: anatomical location. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132(6): 1447-1456.
13. Chubb DP, Taylor GI, Ashton MW. True and ‘choke’ anastomoses between perforator angiosomes. Part II: dynamic thermographic identification. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132(6): 1457-1464.
14. Medical Board of Australia. [Cited 6 December 2017.] Available from URL: http://www.medicalboard.gov.au/Accreditation/Specialist-medical-colleges.aspx
15. Australian Medical Council. [Cited 6 December 2017.] Available from URL: https://www.amc.org.au/accreditation/medical-education
16. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. [Cited 6 December 2017.] Available from URL: https://www.surgeons.org/surgical-specialties/plastic-and-reconstructive
17. Hopper I, Ahern S, Best RL, McNeil J, Cooter RD. Australian Breast Device Registry: breast device safety transformed. ANZ J Surg. 2017; 87(1-2): 9-10.
18. Cooter RD, Barker S, Carroll SM et al. International importance of robust breast device registries. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 135(2): 330-336.
19. Cooter RD, Barnett R, Deva A et al. In defense of the International Collaboration of Breast Registry Activities (ICOBRA). Aesthet Surg J. 2016; 36(7): NP225-227.
20. Loch-Wilkinson A, Beath KJ, Knight RJW et al. Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in Australia and New Zealand: high-surface-area textured implants are associated with increased risk. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140(4): 645-654.
21. Kadin ME, Deva A, Xu H et al. Biomarkers provide clues to early events in the pathogenesis of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 36(7): 773-781.
22. Adams WP, Culbertson EJ, Deva AK, Magnusson MR, Layt C, Jewell ML et al. Macrotextured breast implants with defined steps to minimize bacterial contamination around the device: experience in 42,000 implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140(3): 427-431.
23. Zhang WJ, Li YF, Zhang JL, Xu M, Yan RL, Jiang H. Classic citations in main plastic and reconstructive surgery journals. Ann Plast Surg. 2013; 71(1): 103-108.
24. Sugrue CM, Sugrue RM, Kelly JL. Has the quality of aesthetic surgery research improved over the last 20 years? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017; 41(6): 1473-1474.
25. OMICS International. [Cited 6 December 2017.] Available from URL: https://www.omicsonline.org/plastic-surgery-journals-conferences-list.php